By: Cindell Behrmann
Abstract
This research explores the influence of one’s familiarity with individuals who use gender-neutral pronouns on their engagement with content involving gender-neutral pronoun usage in schools on social media. The importance of this study lies in its focus on understanding how personal familiarity can mitigate anti-LGBTQIA+ sentiments and potentially promote supportive interactions in the digital sphere, particularly on the gender-nonconforming community. Despite extensive research on social media’s role in shaping public opinion, little attention has been given to the impact of personal connections on engagement behaviors toward the two-spirited, transgender, non-binary, and gender-nonconforming community. This study investigates whether individuals familiar with people who use gender-neutral pronouns are more likely to engage positively with supportive content towards gender-neutral pronoun usage. Employing a quantitative analysis approach, the research integrates a social media political opinion survey, which asks the respondent to view one of two tweets among other potential drivers: a tweet supporting schools’ inclusion of gender-neutral pronouns or a tweet opposing such a policy. Findings indicated that personal familiarity significantly increases positive engagement with supportive content while decreasing interactions with negative discourse. The implications of this research are vital for developing targeted strategies to combat online discrimination and support LGBTQIA+ advocacy efforts, particularly amidst the rise in regressive policies nationwide towards gender-nonconforming individuals.
Introduction
In the year 2023, the United States witnessed approximately 600 bills across 49 states, negatively targeting the transgender, non-binary, and gender-nonconforming community. This is a 244.8% increase from 2022, with only 174 bills. Nonetheless, as of April 2024––not even halfway through the year––that number already stands at 547 bills (Trans Legislation Tracker, 2024). The years past 2015, marking marriage equality for same-sex couples, brought along many continued successes for America’s LGBTQIA+ community. Although 2021 brought along a steadily more noticeable rise in attention towards transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals, who have since become a target on social media as LGBTQIA+ progress transcends from sexuality-inclusivity to gender-inclusivity. This is particularly evident on social media as pronoun usage has become a common topic of discourse in political opinion spaces from assumptions quickly being formed across the political spectrum from the choice to display pronouns in one’s social media bio or questioning the ethics of assuming or asking for one’s pronouns in daily interactions.
The importance of social media in shaping public opinion cannot be overstated. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram are not just tools for social networking but also battlegrounds where cultural norms and values are contested and propagated. The dual role of social media as both a liberator and a suppressor makes it a compelling subject for scholarly investigation, particularly at a time when digital interactions can have profound real-world consequences. This research aims to delve into the nuanced interactions on social media that influence public perceptions and engagement with LGBTQIA+ content, explicitly focusing on the role of personal familiarity with individuals who use gender-neutral pronouns.
Central to this study is personal familiarity, which previous research has highlighted as a significant factor in reducing prejudices and promoting positive attitudes toward marginalized groups (Smith & Duggan, 2016; Herek, 2009). Gordon Allport, a pioneering psychologist and founder of personality psychology, created a contact hypothesis that states direct interaction between members of an in-group and an out-group, under appropriate conditions, can lead to more inclusive viewpoints and reduce intergroup prejudice (Allport, 1954). In the context of social media, this interaction does not necessarily need to occur face-to-face. However, it can transpire by sharing personal stories, experiences, and supportive content related to individuals utilizing gender-neutral pronouns or simply being aware of an acquaintance of a family member. This research seeks to expand on the existing body of knowledge by exploring how personal familiarity with individuals who use gender-neutral pronouns influences engagement with both supportive and oppositional posts referring to K-12 schools and the growing trend of gender inclusivity towards transgender and other gender-nonconforming individuals. This study hypothesizes that individuals with personal familiarity with people who use gender-neutral pronouns are more likely to engage positively with supportive content, and those who are not personally familiar with it will engage more positively with harmful content. This hypothesis aligns with Allport’s contact hypothesis, underscoring the impact of personal relationships in fostering empathy and understanding across different social and cultural divides (1954). Thus, this research aims to provide insights that could craft better communication strategies for advocacy groups, inform policy decisions on social media governance, and ultimately contribute to a more inclusive and empathetic online environment.
The Importance of Personal Familiarity
In their seemingly groundbreaking yet controversial study, LaCour and Green (2014) initially claimed that direct interactions with LGBTQ+ individuals could significantly alter attitudes toward gay marriage. This premise was deeply rooted in the contact hypothesis, initially formulated by Allport (1954), noting that interpersonal contact is one of the most effective ways to reduce prejudice between majority and minority group members. LaCour and Green’s findings suggested that even brief conversations could foster greater social acceptance, significantly reducing prejudice. However, the integrity of LaCour and Green’s findings were later questioned. Broockman, Kalla, and Aronow (2020) conducted a follow-up investigation which revealed multiple irregularities in the data presented by LaCour. Their thorough examination uncovered that the astonishing results reported in the original study could not be replicated or verified, leading to a retraction of the original paper. This scrutiny invalidated the study’s findings and highlighted the necessity for rigorous verification and transparency in research. Despite the retraction, the initial study’s use of the contact hypothesis remains critical. Allport’s (1954) theory has been supported by numerous studies over the decades, suggesting that adequately managed contact can indeed decrease prejudice. The episode surrounding LaCour’s study is a stark reminder of social science research’s potential positive and negative impacts on public opinion and policy, especially when exploring sensitive topics like LGBTQ+ rights.
Current research revisits these themes with a commitment to methodological integrity. It continues to explore how personal familiarity might influence public attitudes toward gender-neutral pronouns and broader LGBTQ+ issues. By ensuring transparency and rigor in research practices, scholars aim to build on the foundational ideas proposed by Allport while learning from the methodological shortcomings exposed by Broockman, Kalla, and Aronow.
Social media has profoundly transformed communication landscapes, particularly amplifying voices from marginalized communities such as the LGBTQIA+. These platforms serve dual roles: avenues for advocacy and empowerment and sources of potential discrimination and harassment. Social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have become essential tools for LGBTQIA+ individuals and advocacy groups to share stories, connect with others, and mobilize for social change. Castells (2015) argues that the power of networked communication systems lies in their ability to foster social movements and bring about societal change through mass self-communication. This perspective is echoed by Duggan (2017), who notes that 39% of LGBTQIA+ adults report that they have used social media to discuss or engage with LGBTQIA+ issues, underscoring the role of these platforms in community building.
The central theoretical premise of this research is informed by Allport’s contact hypothesis (1954), which posits that interpersonal contact is one of the most potent means to reduce prejudice between diverse groups. Allport suggests that through direct interactions, individuals have the potential to overcome their biases, fostering greater understanding and acceptance (Allport, 1954). This concept has been particularly relevant in studies demonstrating that personal familiarity with members of the LGBTQIA+ community can significantly influence attitudes toward them (Herek, 2009; Smith & Duggan, 2016).
The hypothesis to be tested is whether personal familiarity significantly impacts one being more supportive of gender-neutral pronoun usage. Thus, the null hypothesis, which states there is no statistical significance between variables, is that personal familiarity has no significant impact on making one more supportive of gender-neutral pronoun usage. This hypothesis derives from the assumption that direct interactions with individuals who challenge traditional gender norms can cultivate more favorable attitudes toward LGBTQIA+ rights (Herek, 2009). As relationships with gender-neutral pronoun users deepen, increased empathy and perspective-taking are likely to occur, fostering a supportive stance towards policies promoting LGBTQIA+ equality and inclusion. Expanding on this foundational idea, this study aims to address the gap in research focusing more specifically on gender identity within the LGBTQIA+ community as opposed to other research that primarily focuses on the sexuality aspect of the community. Due to the rise in the discourse surrounding gender identity, especially those who do not identify alongside their corresponding sex assigned at birth, research focusing on gender identity within the LGBTQIA+ beyond the sexuality aspect of the community is warranted. This study thus integrates the principles of social identity theory and intergroup contact theory to explore further the dynamics of online interactions and their impact on support for LGBTQIA+ inclusive policies. Social identity theory highlights that individuals’ self-concept and esteem are strongly tied to their group affiliations, often leading to preferential treatment of in-group members and derogation of out-groups (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Conversely, intergroup contact theory elaborates on how interpersonal contact can diminish prejudice and foster positive relations between groups, emphasizing the importance of equal status and cooperative goals for effective intergroup interactions (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006).
Grounded in these theories, this research examines how personal familiarity with individuals who use gender-neutral pronouns affects public attitudes toward LGBTQIA+ policies on social media. The study’s hypothesis states that familiarity can enhance empathic understanding and support for the rights and well-being of gender-diverse individuals. This hypothesis aligns with findings that direct contact with stigmatized or marginalized groups can lead to more inclusive attitudes and behaviors (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006).
To validate these hypotheses, the study will combine quantitative data from a survey measuring personal familiarity, empathy, need for cognition, and social media behaviors towards support or the lack thereof for LGBTQIA+ policies. This comprehensive approach will allow for a detailed examination of the interplay between personal familiarity and the proposed mediators, shedding light on the complex dynamics that influence public attitudes toward LGBTQIA+ rights and policies.
Research Design
Social media is a valuable landscape for participation recruitment, as the environment is where people are likely to be comfortable sharing their perspectives and experiences with the masses. Online software such as CloudConnect and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) have become essential tools for recruiting participants for various studies. These platforms allow researchers to access diverse populations quickly and cost-effectively, which is particularly important in studies requiring broad demographic variability (Berinsky et al., 2012; Buhrmester et al., 2011). For research focusing on sensitive topics such as LGBTQIA+ rights and public attitudes toward gender-neutral pronouns, these platforms offer participants an additional layer of anonymity. This has the potential to reduce social desirability bias, a form of response bias that can lead to inaccurate data by over-reporting socially acceptable behavior and under-reporting socially unacceptable behaviors, and encourage more honest responses (Paolacci & Chandler, 2010). This methodological approach allows for collecting nuanced data on user interactions and aligns with the broader literature on digital methodologies in social research. Several studies have critically evaluated the utilization of online platforms for participant recruitment. Recent research has emphasized the importance of selecting appropriate data collection platforms to ensure the participant pool’s reliability and diversity. A comparative study by Litman et al. (2022) highlights several advantages of using CloudResearch’s Cloud Connect platform over MTurk. The authors point out that while MTurk has been a popular choice for academic research, it presents challenges such as a high prevalence of inattentive responses and a participant pool that may not adequately represent the general population due to its overrepresentation of specific demographics (Litman et al., 2022). Additionally, concerns about data quality and the potential for fraudulent responses are significant when using MTurk. In contrast, Cloud Connect offers enhanced demographic targeting and quality control measures, which are crucial for reaching a representative sample and ensuring high-quality responses. Given this study’s specific needs to engage a diverse demographic, Cloud Connect was chosen over MTurk. Moreover, the reliance on digital platforms for data collection can lead to biases in sample representation. Although platforms like MTurk and Cloud Connect provide access to a broader demographic than traditional college samples, they may not fully represent the general population. This limitation can affect the external validity of research findings, particularly when extrapolating results to broader societal contexts (Paolacci & Chandler, 2014).
Researchers must critically evaluate the representativeness of their online samples and consider supplementing the data with additional recruitment methods to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand. Additionally, in exploring the dynamics of LGBTQIA+ advocacy on social media, the importance of ethical research practices and data integrity cannot be overstated. A pertinent example of an ethical lapse in social science research is found in the controversial study by LaCour and Green (2014), which initially claimed significant findings on opinion change regarding same-sex marriage through brief canvassing interventions. This study was later retracted due to issues concerning data fabrication and ethical misconduct by LaCour, raising substantial concerns about research validity and ethical standards in sensitive areas (Broockman et al., 2015). The retraction highlighted the importance of rigorous peer review and data verification. It underscored the potential harm that fraudulent research can cause to public trust and the credibility of legitimate advocacy efforts.
Incorporating a range of emotional or psychological measures, such as empathy, into research on social media behaviors is also essential for a comprehensive understanding of how individuals engage with content related to marginalized groups. This approach is supported by the findings of Singer et al. (2009), who developed a tool for quantitatively assessing empathy in various contexts, including responses to distress in others. The study underscores the importance of empathy and related emotional competencies, highlighting their impact on the interactions within social networks. Empathy, which involves the affective and cognitive ability to resonate with others’ emotions, has influenced individuals’ support or opposition towards sensitive content. The cognitive aspect of empathy, in particular, enables individuals to understand and process the emotions and perspectives of others, facilitating more nuanced and compassionate interactions. Higher levels of empathy and related traits are associated with more supportive behaviors in online settings, suggesting that these emotional capacities can significantly shape digital discourse in a positive direction (Singer et al., 2009). By leveraging these insights in the context of social media, this research aims to assess how different emotional competencies, including empathy, influence engagement with content that promotes inclusivity versus content that may perpetuate stigma or discrimination.
This study employs the CloudConnect platform to recruit participants, utilizing an online environment where researchers can engage individuals in completing surveys for a nominal monetary reward. This method was chosen based on findings that samples obtained from online platforms are comparable, and in some aspects superior, to more traditional convenience samples (Berinsky et al., 2012; Buhrmester et al., 2011; Paolacci & Chandler, 2010). The recruitment process involved advertising the study under the broad theme of “social media and politics” to attract a diverse pool of respondents while minimizing selection bias. Eligibility criteria were set to include only U.S. residents aged 18 and above with a 90% or higher survey approval rating on the CloudConnect platform, ensuring reliability and engagement from participants. Upon consenting to participate, individuals provided basic demographic information, including age, race, gender, income, education, and party identification. This demographic data lays the groundwork for subsequent analytical segmentation and helps to contextualize the study findings within the broader demographic landscape. The survey measured participants’ Need for Affect (NFA) and empathy using validated Likert scale batteries, a type of rating system that is used in surveys to measure attitudes. With NFA serving as a need for one to seek or avoid emotional situations, these personality traits were assessed to explore how they might influence engagement with social media content, especially content related to sensitive topics like LGBTQIA+ rights (Maio, & Esses, 2001; Mutz, 1998). An essential part of the study’s methodology involves assessing participants’ social media behaviors, alongside asking their familiarity with individuals who use gender-neutral pronouns. To further explore this engagement, participants are randomly assigned to view one of two simulated social media posts using the Qualtrics platform: one advocating for gender-neutral pronouns in schools and another opposing such a policy. The responses to these posts—liking or sharing—are recorded as vital dependent variables in the study, providing tangible metrics of participants’ engagement with the content.
The analytical framework for this research employs logistic regression, chosen for its appropriateness in examining relationships involving categorical dependent variables. This statistical method is particularly adept at handling cases where the outcome variable is dichotomous, making it an ideal choice for analyzing how various independent variables—such as personal familiarity (PF) with people who use gender-neutral pronouns and participants’ scores on NFA and empathy—affect the likelihood of engaging with specific types of social media content.
To ensure the robustness of the analysis, the study began with data preparation using Stata, a statistical software program. Initially gathered via the CloudConnect platform, the dataset was cleaned and processed to meet the study’s specific needs. Initially, observations that failed an attention-check question within the NFA battery were dropped to enhance data quality. This step ensured that the remaining dataset consisted of responses from participants who engaged thoughtfully with the survey content. Following the initial cleaning, several new variables were generated to consolidate and simplify the analysis. A seven-point party identification variable was created from three separate items, which ranged from -3 (strong Democrat) to +3 (strong Republican), reflecting the spectrum of political affiliations in the United States. Additionally, demographic variables such as race and age were constructed from multiple survey questions to create cohesive and usable categories for subsequent analyses. The gender variable underwent specific transformations to accommodate the study’s focus on gender diversity. Responses categorized as “other” were recorded as missing to maintain consistency in gender categorization, and a dummy variable, a numerical value to represent a characteristic, was created to identify non-binary respondents explicitly. This allowed for a nuanced analysis of responses based on gender identification. Composite scores for NFA and empathy were calculated to capture personality traits relevant to social media engagement. The NFA score involved reversing the coding for specific items to correctly interpret the scale’s direction, ensuring that high scores consistently indicated a higher need for effect. Similarly, the empathy scale was adjusted for reverse-phrased items to maintain directional consistency. These preparatory steps culminated in creating a clean, consolidated dataset that was saved separately from the original data to preserve the integrity of the raw data. This cleaned dataset formed the basis for the following comprehensive analyses, which explored the relationships between personal familiarity, psychological traits, and engagement with LGBTQIA+ content on social media.
Following data preparation, the analysis proceeded with logistic regression to assess the impact of personal familiarity with gender-neutral pronouns alongside other variables such as political ideology, NFA, empathy, and various demographic factors. These analyses aimed to determine the probability of engagement with posts that either support or oppose using gender-neutral pronouns in schools. Then, a simulation predicted probabilities using the clarify package in Stata, designed to enhance logistic regression outputs’ interpretability. This approach simplified the estimation process and provided clearer insights into how different independent variables affect social media behaviors.
The models specifically examined how personal familiarity with gender-neutral pronoun users influences responses to LGBTQIA+ content under conditions where other variables were controlled. The study could simulate and compare different scenarios by setting personal familiarity at two levels—absent and present—while holding other influential factors constant at their mean values. This method facilitated a nuanced understanding of the potential changes in user engagement across different levels of personal familiarity. The results of these analyses were critical for visualizing and understanding the dynamics of social media interactions concerning LGBTQIA+ content, mainly concerning personal familiarity and its role in shaping public discourse.
Analysis and Findings
The logistic regression analysis conducted in this study provides a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing social media engagement, specifically relating to content on gender-neutral pronouns. A critical finding from this research is that personal familiarity has a significant role in shaping responses to such content.
Figure 1. Influence of Personal Familiarity on Liking Behavior
 |
Figure 1 illustrates the probability of participants liking gender-neutral usage posts on social media, categorized by levels of personal familiarity. The graph displays an 11.6% increase in the probability of liking a supportive post when one does have personal familiarity. Meanwhile, this difference is even more significant for the oppositional post as personal familiarity increases liking probability by 19.8%.
Figure 2. Influence of Personal Familiarity on Sharing Behavior
 |
Figure 2 displays the probability of participants sharing gender-neutral usage posts on social media, categorized by levels of personal familiarity. Similar to the liking behavior, the sharing behavior demonstrates a noticeable increase when the participant has a 4.6% increase in personal familiarity. Personal familiarity also decreases the probability of one sharing an oppositional post by 4%. Thus, the analysis suggests that those with personal familiarity have an increased probability of engaging with supportive content and a decreased probability of engaging with oppositional content.
Figure 3. Control Variables
| Liking Supportive Post | Sharing Supportive Post | Liking Oppositional Post | Sharing Oppositional Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF | 0.678(0.285) | 1.105(0.352) | -0.830(0.391) | -0.290(0.489) |
| Ideology | -0.662(0.155) | -0.498(0.178) | 0.867(0.187) | -0.450(0.199) |
| NFA | 0.124(0.011) | 0.015(0.015) | -0.010(0.013) | -0.013(0.016) |
| Empathy | 0.002(0.017) | -0.005(0.023) | -0.007(0.020) | 0.023(0.024) |
| Age | 0.000(0.013) | -0.019(0.018) | -0.014(0.015) | -0.034(0.019) |
| Race | 0.151(0.119) | 0.178(0.147) | 0.092(0.159) | 0.181(0.182) |
| Education | -0.144(0.107) | 0.043(0.138) | 0.140(0.134) | 0.197(0.169) |
| Gender | -0.374(0.291) | -0.172(0.367) | -0.662(0.356) | -0.223(0.424) |
| Party | -0.118(0.101) | -0.010(0.122) | 0.300(0.111) | 0.256(0.124) |
| Income | 0.167(0.066) | 0.021(0.085) | -0.158(0.076) | -0.076(0.093) |
| Constant | -2.487(1.432) | -5.287(1.905) | -2.094(1.712) | -4.979(2.166) |
| NLR chi2 (13) Prob>chi2 Pseudo R2 Log Likelihood | 328106.850.00000.2413-168.03 | 32777.430.00000.2559-112.58 | 288131.590.00000.3589-117.52 | 28859.670.00000.2571-86.21 |
Note: Standard errors in the parentheses. Significant coefficients (p<.05) presented in bold.
Figure 3 presents the effects of various control variables on social media engagement regarding content related to gender-neutral pronouns. Notably, PF shows a significant effect on interactions with supportive posts. Those who have personal connections to individuals using gender-neutral pronouns are more likely to like (β = 0.678, p < 0.05) and share (β = 1.105, p < 0.05) these posts. Conversely, personal familiarity is associated with decreased engagement with oppositional posts, as indicated by the negative coefficients for liking (β = -0.830, p < 0.05) and sharing (β = -0.290, p > 0.05) said content. Meanwhile, as ideological conservatism increases, there is a marked decrease in the likelihood of engaging positively with supportive content about gender-neutral pronouns, evidenced by negative coefficients for liking (β = -0.662, p < 0.000) and sharing (β = -0.498, p < 0.01) supportive posts. On the flip side, higher conservatism scores correlate with an increased propensity to engage with oppositional content, as seen with the positive coefficients for liking (β = 0.867, p < 0.000) and sharing (β = 0.450, p < 0.05) oppositional posts. Other variables, such as age, race, education, gender, and income, do not show significant effects on engagement patterns. This indicates that while demographic factors are often considered predictors of social media behavior, they do not play a substantial role in how users interact with content about gender-neutral pronouns on these platforms.
The analysis reveals that while personal familiarity and ideological conservatism significantly influence engagement with gender-neutral pronoun content, other variables like age, race, education, gender, and income do not exhibit strong effects. This suggests that demographic factors may play a lesser role in shaping social media behaviors concerning gender-neutral pronouns compared to ideological and personal connections.
Discussion and Conclusion
The findings of this research add considerable depth to our understanding of how personal familiarity and ideological leanings influence social media engagement with gender-neutral pronouns. Prior studies have consistently highlighted the role of personal connections in shaping attitudes towards LGBTQIA+ issues. This research corroborates those findings, showing that individuals who know someone who uses gender-neutral pronouns are significantly more likely to engage positively with content supporting these pronouns. This effect remains robust across various forms of engagement, including liking and sharing supportive content, which aligns with the contact hypothesis posited by Allport (1954), suggesting that direct contact with minority groups can reduce prejudice and enhance social acceptance.
Moreover, the impact of ideological leanings on engagement patterns underscores the critical role of political ideology in digital spaces. The data reveals a clear divide: as ideological conservatism increases, engagement with supportive content decreases, while interaction with oppositional content rises. This dichotomy highlights a polarized landscape where ideological beliefs strongly dictate the nature of engagement with content related to gender-neutral pronouns.
In addition to reaffirming the significance of personal familiarity and ideological orientation, these results also challenge the traditional demographic predictors such as age, race, education, and income, which did not exhibit a significant influence on the engagement behaviors observed. This suggests that while demographic factors are often pivotal in many aspects of social behavior, they may play a limited role in contexts where ideological and relational dynamics are more pronounced. This insight is crucial for developing effective digital advocacy strategies, emphasizing the need to focus on ideological and relational dynamics rather than conventional demographic targeting.
Building upon the foundational insights gained from the analysis of personal familiarity and ideological leanings, it is important to delve deeper into the nuances that these factors present in the context of social media interactions about gender-neutral pronouns. The marked increase in positive engagement with content supportive of gender-neutral pronouns among those familiar with individuals using such pronouns not only supports the hypothesis that personal relationships can reduce prejudice but also suggests that these relationships might actively foster advocacy and supportive behaviors online.
Furthermore, the significant role of ideological conservatism in reducing support for gender-neutral pronouns while simultaneously increasing engagement with oppositional content highlights the deeply entrenched nature of political ideologies in shaping responses to LGBTQIA+ related issues. This finding suggests that on platforms like social media, where users often encounter a mix of echo chambers and confrontational interactions, the influence of ideology is particularly potent. It’s evident that individuals with conservative leanings are not merely passive consumers of content but are actively engaging in ways that reinforce their ideological stands.
This behavior underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms through which ideological content is disseminated and the ways in which it influences user interactions. Social media platforms, therefore, serve not just as spaces for information exchange but as active battlegrounds where ideological conflicts are played out, often influencing public opinion and social norms.
These dynamics are critical for policymakers, educators, and activists who aim to leverage social media for social change. Knowing that personal familiarity can enhance positive engagement suggests that campaigns that highlight personal stories or provide direct interactions with LGBTQIA+ individuals could be more effective in shifting public attitudes. Conversely, the strong influence of conservative ideology suggests that merely providing information may not be sufficient to change deeply held beliefs; instead, strategies that address underlying ideological barriers and foster empathetic understanding across ideological divides are needed.
In this light, it becomes imperative to craft interventions that are not only demographically inclusive but are also sensitive to the ideological spectrums and personal experiences of the target audiences. This approach will not only help create a more tolerant online environment but will also contribute to the broader societal acceptance of gender-neutral pronouns and the individuals who use them.
In summary, the empirical findings of this study provide a layered understanding of the dynamics at play in the engagement with gender-neutral pronoun content on social media. The significant effects of personal familiarity and ideological conservatism underline a complex interplay of personal and political factors that influence user behaviors online. While personal familiarity tends to foster supportive engagement, ideological conservatism clearly delineates the boundaries of this support, often leading to increased engagement with oppositional content.
This pattern of engagement highlights the role of social media as a significant arena for ideological expression, where personal and societal beliefs are not only represented but are actively contested. For digital advocacy and online campaigns aiming to promote LGBTQIA+ rights, these insights suggest that understanding the audience’s ideological backgrounds and their personal connections to the LGBTQIA+ community could enhance the effectiveness of their strategies. Tailoring messages to bridge ideological divides and emphasizing personal stories and interactions may help mitigate biases and foster a more inclusive online discourse.
Moreover, the lack of significant impact by demographic variables such as age, race, education, and gender on the engagement patterns suggests that while these factors are often considered pivotal in traditional media and marketing strategies, they may hold less sway in discussions centered around sensitive social issues like gender identity on digital platforms. This could indicate a shift towards a more ideologically and personally driven interaction paradigm in digital spaces, which demands a more nuanced approach to campaign designs and engagement strategies.
Therefore, for future research and practical applications, it is crucial to integrate an understanding of ideological leanings and personal familiarity into the development of digital content and interventions. By doing so, stakeholders can more effectively navigate the complexities of social media engagement, promoting a more inclusive and supportive environment for discussing and advocating for gender-neutral pronouns and broader LGBTQIA+ rights. This study not only contributes to the scholarly discourse on social media dynamics and gender identity but also provides actionable insights for those working towards social change in digital spaces.
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057.
Broockman, D., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2020, January 7). Irregularities in LaCour (2014). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/qy2se.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5. Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Duggan, M. (2017). Online harassment 2017. Pew Research Center.
Herek G. M. (2009). Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United States: prevalence estimates from a national probability sample. Journal of interpersonal violence, 24(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508316477.
LaCour, M. J., & Green, D. P. (2014). When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality. Science, 346(6215), 1366-1369. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256151.
Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior research methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of personality, 69(4), 583–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.694156.
Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175074.
Singer, E., Van Hoewyk J, & Maher, M. P. (2000). Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1086/317761. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2000). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational Identity: A Reader (pp. 56–65). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005.
TransLegislation. (2024). TransLegislation. https://translegislation.com
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419. doi:10.1017/S1930297500002205.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.